FightChoice Intelligence Report

vs

Tommy McMillen vs Marwan Rahiki

https://fightchoice.app/events/tommy-mcmillen-vs-marwan-rahiki-prediction-2026-09-12

Featherweight

Noche UFC: Silva vs. Delgado · Sep 12, 2026

In This Report

Prediction IntelClick here to expand

Stats Model Prediction

🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Sep 10, 2026, 19:03 UTC

Model Breakdown
Tommy McMillen Marwan Rahiki
Deep Learning Model α 20% weight 57.0% 43.0%
Deep Learning Model ξ 22% weight 59.9% 40.1%
Statistical Model δ 20% weight 75.8% 24.2%
Statistical Model β 20% weight 82.5% 17.5%
Statistical Model ε 18% weight 93.7% 6.3%
Ensemble 80.0% 20.0%
AI Reasoning (why the models picked this)

The ensemble prediction favors Tommy McMillen, driven by his significant strikes landed and reach advantage over Marwan Rahiki, with all individual models agreeing on this outcome.

  • Statistical Model β: Model β favors Tommy McMillen, citing his reach advantage over Marwan Rahiki and that Tommy McMillen is past his prime.
  • Statistical Model ε: Model ε favors Tommy McMillen, pointing to his reach and significant strikes landed advantages over Marwan Rahiki, as well as Marwan Rahiki being orthodox.

AI-generated from the model outputs above — wording may occasionally be imprecise.

Predicted Winner
Tommy McMillen
80.0%
Confidence
* Model output, not betting advice. Bet responsibly.

*New fighters, prediction made with limited information

Predicted Duration
1st Round at 3m45s (3m45s total)

Chance the Fight Is Still Going

41% Chance of Decision

The dashed line is 50%. The round where the curve crosses it is the round named above — the midpoint of the distribution, not necessarily its single most likely outcome.

Path To Victory
Fighter By decision *Based on 99 similar fights By KO/TKO *Based on 99 similar fights By submission *Based on 99 similar fights Win Confidence *Based on our prediction
Tommy McMillen 42.8% 18.6% 18.6% 80.0%
Marwan Rahiki 10.7% 4.6% 4.6% 20.0%
99 historical bouts 53.5% 23.2% 23.2% 100.0%
Share This Intel Report
Fighter IntelClick here to expand

Tale of the Tape

Stat Tommy McMillen Marwan Rahiki
Career Record 12-0 9-1
Height 6' 0" —
Weight 145 lbs. 145 lbs.
Reach 74" —
Stance Orthodox —
Age 28 —

Records are official career records, all promotions included.

Export as Image

Matchup IntelClick here to expand

How Similar Fights Ended

99 historical bouts

Every past fight is placed by the SHAPE of its mismatch — how far apart the two fighters were on each of 37 career measures, setting aside which one was ahead. Fights that sit close together form a profile. Below is how the 99 bouts in this bout's profile actually ended.

54% Reached the judges
46% Ended early
23% KO/TKO 23% Submission 4:55 Median finish, round 1
When those finishes came

This is a base rate over similar past matchups, not a prediction about these two fighters. It is drawn from what happened historically, and the profile is blind to which corner is which — so it can say how fights like this one tend to go, and nothing at all about who wins.

Fights with a similar mismatch

Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.

Fight Tommy McMillen Marwan Rahiki
73% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jan 14, 2012
UFC 142: Aldo vs Mendes
Middleweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
0
Strike accuracy
0%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
2s
Rousimar Palhares Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 1m03s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
4
Strike accuracy
50%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
1s
70% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 10, 2012
UFC Macao: Franklin vs Le
Welterweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
0.7
Strike accuracy
20%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
5.7s
Dong Hyun Kim Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
7.3
Strike accuracy
55%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.7
Control time (Per Rnd)
243.7s
68% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 11, 2023
UFC Fight Night: Yan vs. Dvalishvili
Bantamweight
Jonathan Martinez Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12.7
Strike accuracy
69.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
123s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
15.7
Strike accuracy
60.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
33.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.7
Control time (Per Rnd)
87s
67% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 12, 2011
UFC on FOX: Velasquez vs Dos Santos
Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
8
Strike accuracy
41.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
38.3s
Alex Caceres Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
34
Strike accuracy
58.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
17s
66% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Oct 23, 2021
UFC Fight Night: Costa vs. Vettori
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
16.5
Strike accuracy
33.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
7.5s
Alex Caceres Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 3m31s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
23
Strike accuracy
71.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.5
Control time (Per Rnd)
24.5s
66% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 3, 2019
UFC Fight Night: Covington vs. Lawler
Light Heavyweight
Kennedy Nzechukwu Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
16.7
Strike accuracy
40.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
20
Strike accuracy
44.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
40%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
42.7s
64% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Apr 10, 2021
UFC Fight Night: Vettori vs. Holland
Lightweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
5
Strike accuracy
20.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Mateusz Gamrot Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 1m22s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
19.5
Strike accuracy
61.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
40%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
25s
64% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 15, 2008
UFC 91: Couture vs Lesnar
Lightweight
Mark Bocek Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 3m16s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
7
Strike accuracy
47.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
2
Control time (Per Rnd)
233.3s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
1.7
Strike accuracy
35.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
17.3s
64% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Feb 4, 2023
UFC Fight Night: Lewis vs. Spivac
Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
4
Strike accuracy
40%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Rinya Nakamura Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 0m33s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11
Strike accuracy
44%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
3s
63% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 24, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Cannonier vs. Borralho
Middleweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
24
Strike accuracy
42.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
70.5s
Gerald Meerschaert Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 4m12s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
10.5
Strike accuracy
47.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.5
Takedown accuracy
16.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.5
Control time (Per Rnd)
10.5s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
May 8, 2021
UFC Fight Night: Rodriguez vs. Waterson
Middleweight
Phil Hawes Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
22
Strike accuracy
65.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
111.3s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
9.3
Strike accuracy
34.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
84.3s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jul 19, 2025
UFC 318: Holloway vs. Poirier 3
Middleweight
Brendan Allen Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
37
Strike accuracy
49.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
75%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
29s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
36.3
Strike accuracy
43.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
25.7s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 12, 2022
UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Ankalaev
Women's Flyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
7.5
Strike accuracy
31.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Miranda Maverick Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 2m15s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
9.5
Strike accuracy
38%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
2
Takedown accuracy
57.1%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.5
Control time (Per Rnd)
121s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jan 26, 2013
UFC on FOX: Johnson vs Dodson
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
7
Strike accuracy
31.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
10s
Ricardo Lamas Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 2m32s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
16
Strike accuracy
57.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
98s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Oct 23, 2010
UFC 121: Lesnar vs Velasquez
Welterweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12
Strike accuracy
55.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
33.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
30.7s
Diego Sanchez Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
16
Strike accuracy
42.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
184.7s

Export as Image

Statistics IntelClick here to expand

Head-to-Head Statistics

The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.

Stat Tommy McMillen Marwan Rahiki
Per Round Average
Strikes 59.3 31.8
Strike accuracy 46.9% 50%
Takedowns 0.7 0.2
Takedown accuracy 100% 50%
Sub attempts 0.4 0
Control time 50.9s 17.7s
Knockdowns 0.57 0.33
Knockdowns absorbed 0.14 0.17
Advanced Fighter Statistics
win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. 100.0% 75.0%
recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. 100.0% 75.0%
win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. 6 -1
total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. 6 4
head strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the head. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 70.4% 62.8%
body strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the body. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 23.1% 23.0%
leg strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the legs. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 6.5% 14.1%
sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 22.14 27.17
takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 0.14 0.83
cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.58 0.11
cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.26 0.28
cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 2 5.000
is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. Yes No
is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. No No
switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. No No
finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 66.7% 100.0%
KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. 50.0% 100.0%
sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 16.7% 0.0%
been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. 0.0% 0.0%
distance strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown at distance. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 90.1% 92.1%
clinch strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown in the clinch. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 7.0% 6.3%
ground strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown on the ground. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 2.9% 1.6%
avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. 10:49 9:16
Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. 1,547.2 1,514.6
PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. 0.118 0.020
career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. Peak Peak
Market IntelClick here to expand

Betting Edge

Fighter Win confidence DraftKings odds Break-even Edge
Tommy McMillen 80.0% 1.68 59.5% +34.4%
Marwan Rahiki 20.0% 2.24 44.6% -55.2%

Odds are the latest we have from DraftKings. Edge = win confidence × decimal odds − 1, so a positive edge means the price pays more than our model thinks the fighter is worth.

Break-even = 1 ÷ decimal odds — the win rate you would need at that price just to come out level. It is the raw price, with the bookmaker's margin still in it, so the two fighters' break-evens add up to more than 100%: that surplus is the book's cut, not a mistake.

Recommended stake 31% of bankroll on Tommy McMillen at 1.61 (BetOnline) * Model output, not betting advice. Bet responsibly.

Market Odds

Sportsbook Tommy McMillen Marwan Rahiki
US Decimal US Decimal
Proline -179 1.56 +112 2.12
DraftKings -147 1.68 +124 2.24
FanDuel -167 1.60 +140 2.40
BetMGM -164 1.61 +135 2.35
Bovada -161 1.62 +135 2.35
BetOnline -161 1.62 +138 2.38

Odds captured Sep 12, 2026, 6:03 PM

Export as Image

More from Noche UFC: Silva vs. Delgado

Jean Silva vs Jose Miguel Delgado Brandon Moreno vs Joseph Morales Manon Fiorot vs Alexa Grasso Waldo Cortes Acosta vs Curtis Blaydes David Martinez vs Dan Ige Tim Elliott vs Edgar Chairez Ignacio Bahamondes vs Muslim Salikhov Yousri Belgaroui vs Djorden Santos Drakkar Klose vs Tommy Gantt Rafa Garcia vs Rongzhu Sean King vs Jessie Rosas Sean King III vs Jessie Rosas JJ Aldrich vs Regina Tarin

Put your own money-free bets on Tommy McMillen vs Marwan Rahiki

Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.

Create your free account