FightChoice Intelligence Report

vs

Tim Elliott vs Edgar Chairez

https://fightchoice.app/events/tim-elliott-vs-edgar-chairez-prediction-2026-09-12

Catch Weight

Noche UFC: Silva vs. Delgado · Sep 12, 2026

In This Report

Prediction IntelClick here to expand

Stats Model Prediction

🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Sep 10, 2026, 19:03 UTC

Model Breakdown
Tim Elliott Edgar Chairez
Deep Learning Model α 20% weight 43.3% 56.7%
Deep Learning Model ξ 22% weight 47.9% 52.1%
Statistical Model δ 20% weight 41.4% 58.6%
Statistical Model β 20% weight 42.2% 57.8%
Statistical Model ε 18% weight 34.5% 65.5%
Ensemble 37.8% 62.2%
AI Reasoning (why the models picked this)

Edgar Chairez is favored by the ensemble prediction. The most influential factors across models include Tim Elliott being past his prime and older, with Edgar Chairez also showing advantages in distance striking and win streaks. Despite a split in individual model opinions, the calibrated ensemble favors Edgar Chairez.

  • Statistical Model β: Model β favors Edgar Chairez, citing that Tim Elliott is past his prime and has a lower win rate, though Tim Elliott has landed more takedowns.
  • Statistical Model ε: Model ε favors Edgar Chairez, pointing to Edgar Chairez's distance strike share and Tim Elliott's age, southpaw stance, and reach disadvantage.

AI-generated from the model outputs above — wording may occasionally be imprecise.

Predicted Winner
Edgar Chairez
62.2%
Confidence
* Model output, not betting advice. Bet responsibly.
Predicted Duration
Decision (15m00s total)

Chance the Fight Is Still Going

56% Chance of Decision

The curve stays above 50% all the way to the final bell, which is why the call above is a decision.

Share This Intel Report
Fighter IntelClick here to expand

Tale of the Tape

Stat Tim Elliott Edgar Chairez
UFC Record 11-12 4-3-1
Height 5' 7" 5' 7"
Weight 125 lbs. 125 lbs.
Reach 66" 71"
Stance Southpaw Orthodox
Age 39 30

Records count UFC bouts only (wins-losses-no contests) — we have no verified pre-UFC record for both of these fighters.

Export as Image

Matchup IntelClick here to expand

How Similar Fights Ended

20 historical bouts

Not enough similar fights on record to quote a rate for this profile.

Fights with a similar mismatch

Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.

Fight Tim Elliott Edgar Chairez
67% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jan 30, 2016
UFC on FOX: Johnson vs. Bader
Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13.7
Strike accuracy
38.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0.3s
Jimmie Rivera Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
15
Strike accuracy
44.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
44s
65% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 28, 2021
UFC Fight Night: Barboza vs. Chikadze
Middleweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
22.7
Strike accuracy
55.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
38s
Wellington Turman Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
23
Strike accuracy
58%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
22.2%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
58s
65% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 2, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Albazi
Women's Flyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
8.3
Strike accuracy
33.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
33.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
155s
Jamey-Lyn Horth Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
9.7
Strike accuracy
41.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
50s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 12, 2023
UFC Fight Night: Luque vs. Dos Anjos
Welterweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13.2
Strike accuracy
48.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.4
Takedown accuracy
28.6%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.2
Control time (Per Rnd)
46.8s
Vicente Luque Winner
Decision 5th Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
14.4
Strike accuracy
51.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.6
Takedown accuracy
72.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
144.2s
58% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 16, 2025
UFC 319: Du Plessis vs. Chimaev
Flyweight
Tim Elliott Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 4m39s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13.5
Strike accuracy
38%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
66.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
57s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
10.5
Strike accuracy
24.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0.5s
58% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 14, 2011
UFC Live: Hardy vs Lytle
Lightweight
Jacob Volkmann Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
2
Strike accuracy
37.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
60%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
2
Control time (Per Rnd)
156s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
7.3
Strike accuracy
73.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
61.7s
58% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jul 11, 2012
UFC on FUEL TV: Munoz vs Weidman
Lightweight
Rafael Dos Anjos Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
17
Strike accuracy
60%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
2
Takedown accuracy
35.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
134s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
10.7
Strike accuracy
36.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
58% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 14, 2020
UFC Fight Night: Lee vs. Oliveira
Lightweight
Francisco Trinaldo Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
18.3
Strike accuracy
43.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
22.3
Strike accuracy
54.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
57% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jan 20, 2021
UFC Fight Night: Chiesa vs. Magny
Welterweight
Michael Chiesa Winner
Decision 5th Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
4.8
Strike accuracy
46.2%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.8
Takedown accuracy
66.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
184.2s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
2.4
Strike accuracy
24%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.2
Takedown accuracy
33.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.2
Control time (Per Rnd)
27s
57% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Dec 7, 2024
UFC 310: Pantoja vs. Asakura
Welterweight
Michael Chiesa Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 1m56s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
4.3
Strike accuracy
33.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
76s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
3.3
Strike accuracy
29.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
26.3s
57% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Apr 22, 2017
UFC Fight Night: Swanson vs. Lobov
Lightweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
4
Strike accuracy
26.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Al Iaquinta Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 1m38s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12
Strike accuracy
63.2%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
5s
57% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 19, 2022
UFC Fight Night: Volkov vs. Aspinall
Featherweight
Makwan Amirkhani Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 0m57s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
0
Strike accuracy
0%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
15s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
0
Strike accuracy
0%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
31s
57% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jan 1, 2011
UFC 125: Resolution
Welterweight
Daniel Roberts Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 3m45s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
3
Strike accuracy
23.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
2
Control time (Per Rnd)
106s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
6
Strike accuracy
46.2%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
31s
57% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Oct 23, 2010
UFC 121: Lesnar vs Velasquez
Welterweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
0
Strike accuracy
0%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
17s
Daniel Roberts Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 1m13s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
2
Strike accuracy
20%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
2s
56% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 25, 2023
UFC Fight Night: Vera vs. Sandhagen
Women's Bantamweight
Holly Holm Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
10.7
Strike accuracy
50.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
66.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
196.3s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
7
Strike accuracy
45.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
26.3s

Export as Image

Statistics IntelClick here to expand

Head-to-Head Statistics

The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.

Stat Tim Elliott Edgar Chairez
Per Round Average
Strikes 16.9 17.6
Strike accuracy 42.4% 47.4%
Takedowns 1.2 0
Takedown accuracy 45.5% 0%
Sub attempts 0.3 0.5
Control time 86.7s 6.9s
Knockdowns 0.03 0.19
Knockdowns absorbed 0 0
Advanced Fighter Statistics
win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. 47.8% 76.0%
recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. 60.0% 60.0%
win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. 1 -1
total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. 23 25
head strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the head. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 59.3% 64.7%
body strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the body. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 18.9% 18.6%
leg strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the legs. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 21.8% 16.7%
sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 14.47 21.6
takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 0.43 0.8
cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.75 0.76
cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.9 0.86
cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.43 0.000
is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. No Yes
is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. Yes No
switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. No No
finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 27.3% 78.9%
KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. 0.0% 21.1%
sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 27.3% 57.9%
been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. 41.7% 33.3%
distance strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown at distance. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 66.2% 95.5%
clinch strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown in the clinch. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 15.8% 1.9%
ground strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown on the ground. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 18.0% 2.6%
avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. 12:23 9:51
Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. 1,523.2 1,512.9
PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. 0.196 0.130
career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. Peak Peak
Market IntelClick here to expand

Betting Edge

Fighter Win confidence DraftKings odds Break-even Edge
Tim Elliott 37.8% 2.60 38.5% -1.6%
Edgar Chairez 62.2% 1.52 65.8% -5.5%

Odds are the latest we have from DraftKings. Edge = win confidence × decimal odds − 1, so a positive edge means the price pays more than our model thinks the fighter is worth.

Break-even = 1 ÷ decimal odds — the win rate you would need at that price just to come out level. It is the raw price, with the bookmaker's margin still in it, so the two fighters' break-evens add up to more than 100%: that surplus is the book's cut, not a mistake.

Recommended stake No bet recommended at the price we recorded.

Market Odds

Sportsbook Tim Elliott Edgar Chairez
US Decimal US Decimal
Proline +155 2.55 -250 1.40
DraftKings +160 2.60 -192 1.52
FanDuel +172 2.72 -204 1.49
BetMGM +165 2.65 -200 1.50
Bovada +163 2.63 -189 1.53
BetOnline +159 2.59 -189 1.53

Odds captured Sep 12, 2026, 6:03 PM

Export as Image

More from Noche UFC: Silva vs. Delgado

Jean Silva vs Jose Miguel Delgado Brandon Moreno vs Joseph Morales Tommy McMillen vs Marwan Rahiki Manon Fiorot vs Alexa Grasso Waldo Cortes Acosta vs Curtis Blaydes David Martinez vs Dan Ige Ignacio Bahamondes vs Muslim Salikhov Yousri Belgaroui vs Djorden Santos Drakkar Klose vs Tommy Gantt Rafa Garcia vs Rongzhu Sean King vs Jessie Rosas Sean King III vs Jessie Rosas JJ Aldrich vs Regina Tarin

Put your own money-free bets on Tim Elliott vs Edgar Chairez

Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.

Create your free account