FightChoice Intelligence Report

vs

Deiveson Figueiredo vs Payton Talbott

https://fightchoice.app/events/deiveson-figueiredo-vs-payton-talbott-prediction-2026-10-03

Bantamweight

UFC 332: Silva vs. Wang · Oct 3, 2026

In This Report

Prediction Intel

Stats Model Prediction

🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Sep 12, 2026, 00:05 UTC

Model Breakdown
Deiveson Figueiredo Payton Talbott
Deep Learning Model α 20% weight 43.3% 56.7%
Deep Learning Model ξ 22% weight 47.8% 52.2%
Statistical Model δ 20% weight 16.7% 83.3%
Statistical Model β 20% weight 23.1% 76.9%
Statistical Model ε 18% weight 28.7% 71.3%
Ensemble 23.8% 76.2%
AI Reasoning (why the models picked this)

The ensemble prediction favors Payton Talbott, driven by significant advantages in age and past prime status across multiple models. Payton Talbott also shows edges in sig strike accuracy and landed strikes. Despite this, Deiveson Figueiredo holds a slight advantage in takedown accuracy according to one model. The final prediction leans towards Talbott due to the overwhelming consensus on age and prime factors.

  • Statistical Model β: Model β favors Payton Talbott, citing his advantages in age, being past prime, win rate, and sig strike accuracy over Deiveson Figueiredo.
  • Statistical Model ε: Model ε favors Payton Talbott, pointing to his switch stance and the age difference, along with Deiveson Figueiredo's sig strikes landed.

AI-generated from the model outputs above — wording may occasionally be imprecise.

Predicted Winner
Payton Talbott
76.2%
Confidence
* Model output, not betting advice. Bet responsibly.
Predicted Duration
Decision (15m00s total)

Chance the Fight Is Still Going

55% Chance of Decision

The curve stays above 50% all the way to the final bell, which is why the call above is a decision.

Path To Victory
Fighter By decision *Based on 35 similar fights By KO/TKO *Based on 35 similar fights By submission *Based on 35 similar fights Win Confidence *Based on our prediction
Deiveson Figueiredo 10.9% 10.9% 2.0% 23.8%
Payton Talbott 34.8% 34.8% 6.5% 76.2%
35 historical bouts 45.7% 45.7% 8.6% 100.0%
Share This Intel Report Export as Image
Matchup Intel

How Similar Fights Ended

35 historical bouts

Every past fight is placed by the SHAPE of its mismatch — how far apart the two fighters were on each of 37 career measures, setting aside which one was ahead. Fights that sit close together form a profile. Below is how the 35 bouts in this bout's profile actually ended.

46% Reached the judges
54% Ended early
46% KO/TKO 9% Submission 2:42 Median finish, round 1
When those finishes came

This is a base rate over similar past matchups, not a prediction about these two fighters. It is drawn from what happened historically, and the profile is blind to which corner is which — so it can say how fights like this one tend to go, and nothing at all about who wins.

Fights with a similar mismatch

Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.

Fight Deiveson Figueiredo Payton Talbott
67% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Dec 29, 2012
UFC 155: Dos Santos vs Velasquez II
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
29.7
Strike accuracy
24.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
32.3s
Max Holloway Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
40
Strike accuracy
44.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
2.7s
64% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 17, 2019
UFC 241: Cormier vs. Miocic 2
Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
15
Strike accuracy
55.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
66.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
43.3s
Cory Sandhagen Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
20.7
Strike accuracy
53.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
75.3s
63% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Dec 14, 2019
UFC 245: Usman vs. Covington
Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
6
Strike accuracy
23.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
5.3s
Petr Yan Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 0m43s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
18
Strike accuracy
50%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
29s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jul 13, 2016
UFC Fight Night: McDonald vs. Lineker
Women's Strawweight
Cortney Casey Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 2m36s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
19
Strike accuracy
67.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
2
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
57s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
5
Strike accuracy
41.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 27, 2016
UFC on FOX: Maia vs. Condit
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13.7
Strike accuracy
47.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
36.4%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
98.7s
Anthony Pettis Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 1m49s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
17.7
Strike accuracy
60.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
63.7s
62% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
May 9, 2020
UFC 249: Ferguson vs. Gaethje
Featherweight
Bryce Mitchell Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13.3
Strike accuracy
81.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1.7
Control time (Per Rnd)
257s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
1.7
Strike accuracy
50%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
60% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Dec 14, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Covington vs. Buckley
Welterweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12.3
Strike accuracy
29.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
12.5%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
73.3s
Joaquin Buckley Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 4m42s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
25
Strike accuracy
49.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
26s
60% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Feb 22, 2014
UFC 170: Rousey vs McMann
Women's Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13
Strike accuracy
65%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Ronda Rousey Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 1m06s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
14
Strike accuracy
60.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
43s
60% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Apr 30, 2011
UFC 129: St-Pierre vs Shields
Light Heavyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
2.5
Strike accuracy
21.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
3s
Lyoto Machida Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 1m05s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
7.5
Strike accuracy
31.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
1s
59% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 18, 2016
UFC Fight Night: MacDonald vs Thompson
Middleweight
Krzysztof Jotko Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 0m59s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
4
Strike accuracy
40%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
1s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
2
Strike accuracy
33.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
59% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 28, 2026
UFC Fight Night: Adesanya vs. Pyfer
Women's Flyweight
Alexa Grasso Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 2m42s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12
Strike accuracy
31.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
2s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
5
Strike accuracy
20%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
59% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 20, 2016
UFC 202: Diaz vs. McGregor 2
Welterweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
33.2
Strike accuracy
48.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.2
Takedown accuracy
14.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
70s
Conor McGregor Winner
Decision 5th Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
32.8
Strike accuracy
57.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
18.2s
59% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jul 2, 2022
UFC 276: Adesanya vs. Cannonier
Women's Flyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11.7
Strike accuracy
56.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
163s
Maycee Barber Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
21
Strike accuracy
64.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
37.3s
59% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Sep 16, 2023
Noche UFC: Grasso vs. Shevchenko 2
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
24
Strike accuracy
34.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
2.3s
Kyle Nelson Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
27.3
Strike accuracy
44.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
58% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 9, 2018
UFC 225: Whittaker vs. Romero 2
Heavyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
17
Strike accuracy
40.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
12.7s
Tai Tuivasa Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
18
Strike accuracy
45%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
33s

Export as Image

Tale of the Tape

Tale of the Tape

Stat Deiveson Figueiredo Payton Talbott
UFC Record 14-7-1 5-1
Height 5' 5" 5' 10"
Weight 135 lbs. 135 lbs.
Reach 68" 70"
Stance Orthodox Switch
Age 38 28

Records count UFC bouts only (wins-losses-no contests) — we have no verified pre-UFC record for both of these fighters.

Statistics Intel

Head-to-Head Statistics

The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.

Stat Deiveson Figueiredo Payton Talbott
Per Round Average
Strikes 12.2 24.1
Strike accuracy 53.9% 59%
Takedowns 0.5 0.3
Takedown accuracy 34.9% 50%
Sub attempts 0.4 0.1
Control time 44.5s 54.7s
Knockdowns 0.20 0.20
Knockdowns absorbed 0.02 0
Advanced Fighter Statistics
win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. 66.7% 94.1%
recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. 20.0% 80.0%
win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. -2 2
total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. 21 17
head strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the head. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 58.2% 72.4%
body strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the body. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 28.9% 19.6%
leg strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the legs. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 12.9% 8.0%
sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 15.35 12.33
takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 0.48 0.93
cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.46 0.79
cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.31 0.9
cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.12 0.5
is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. Yes No
is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. No No
switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. No Yes
finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 57.1% 81.3%
KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. 28.6% 62.5%
sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 28.6% 18.8%
been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. 57.1% 0.0%
distance strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown at distance. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 71.9% 64.6%
clinch strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown in the clinch. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 8.4% 11.9%
ground strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown on the ground. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 19.6% 23.5%
avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. 12:08 10:16
Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. 1,594.9 1,563.6
PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. 0.511 0.304
career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. Decline Peak
Market Intel

Betting Edge

Fighter Win confidence DraftKings odds Break-even Edge
Deiveson Figueiredo 23.8% 6.00 16.7% +42.7%
Payton Talbott 76.2% 1.14 87.7% -13.1%

Odds are the latest we have from DraftKings. Edge = win confidence × decimal odds − 1, so a positive edge means the price pays more than our model thinks the fighter is worth.

Break-even = 1 ÷ decimal odds — the win rate you would need at that price just to come out level. It is the raw price, with the bookmaker's margin still in it, so the two fighters' break-evens add up to more than 100%: that surplus is the book's cut, not a mistake.

Recommended stake No bet recommended at the price we recorded.

Market Odds

Sportsbook Deiveson Figueiredo Payton Talbott
US Decimal US Decimal
Proline +420 5.20 -1000 1.10
DraftKings +500 6.00 -714 1.14
FanDuel +440 5.40 -667 1.15
BetOnline +505 6.05 -714 1.14

Odds captured Sep 24, 2026, 12:02 AM

Export as Image

More from UFC 332: Silva vs. Wang

Natalia Silva vs Wang Cong King Green vs Esteban Ribovics Roberto Soldic vs Khaos Williams Ateba Gautier vs Roman Kopylov Imanol Rodriguez vs Alden Coria Damian Pinas vs Andrey Pulyaev Marcus McGhee vs Bernardo Sopaj Anthony Wint vs Lucas Armand Johnny Walker vs Mick Parkin Rafael Dos Anjos vs Alexander Hernandez Marvin Vettori vs Ismail Naurdiev Court McGee vs Eric Nolan

Put your own money-free bets on Deiveson Figueiredo vs Payton Talbott

Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.

Create your free account