FightChoice Intelligence Report
https://fightchoice.app/events/court-mcgee-vs-eric-nolan-prediction-2026-10-03
UFC 332: Silva vs. Wang · Oct 3, 2026
🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Sep 12, 2026, 00:04 UTC
The ensemble prediction favors Eric Nolan, driven by significant age advantages and past prime indicators for Nolan across multiple models. Court McGee's Elo rating and ground strike share were insufficient to sway the combined prediction, which ultimately favored Eric Nolan.
AI-generated from the model outputs above — wording may occasionally be imprecise.
*New fighters, prediction made with limited information
The dashed line is 50%. The round where the curve crosses it is the round named above — the midpoint of the distribution, not necessarily its single most likely outcome.
1 historical bouts
Not enough similar fights on record to quote a rate for this profile.
Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.
| Fight | Court McGee | Eric Nolan |
|---|---|---|
|
67%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC on FUEL TV: Silva vs. Stann
|
Mark Hunt
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
53%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Holloway vs. The Korean Zombie
|
Fight Performance
|
Junior Tafa
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
51%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 196: McGregor vs Diaz
|
Nordine Taleb
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
51%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Lewis vs. Dos Santos
|
Yana Santos
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
50%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Maia vs. Usman
|
Guido Cannetti
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
50%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC on FOX: Holm vs. Shevchenko
|
Fight Performance
|
Jason Knight
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
49%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 225: Whittaker vs. Romero 2
|
Fight Performance
|
Charles Oliveira
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
49%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 141: Lesnar vs Overeem
|
Fight Performance
|
Alexander Gustafsson
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
48%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Tsarukyan vs. Hooker
|
Aleksandre Topuria
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
46%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Bigfoot vs Mir
|
Frankie Saenz
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
46%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 73: Stacked
|
Sean Sherk
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
46%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 282: Blachowicz vs. Ankalaev
|
Fight Performance
|
Paddy Pimblett
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
46%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 136: Edgar vs Maynard 3
|
Aaron Simpson
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
45%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 260: Miocic vs. Ngannou
|
Fight Performance
|
Francis Ngannou
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
45%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC on FX: Guillard vs Miller
|
Jorge Rivera
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
| Stat | Court McGee | Eric Nolan |
|---|---|---|
| UFC Record | 11-13 | 0-2 |
| Height | 5' 11" | 6' 2" |
| Weight | 170 lbs. | 185 lbs. |
| Reach | 75" | 74" |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| Age | 41 | 29 |
Records count UFC bouts only (wins-losses-no contests) — we have no verified pre-UFC record for both of these fighters.
The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.
| Stat | Court McGee | Eric Nolan |
|---|---|---|
| Per Round Average | ||
| Strikes | 21.7 | 7.4 |
| Strike accuracy | 36.9% | 34.6% |
| Takedowns | 0.6 | 0 |
| Takedown accuracy | 24.8% | 0% |
| Sub attempts | 0.1 | 0 |
| Control time | 68.4s | 4s |
| Knockdowns | 0.05 | 0 |
| Knockdowns absorbed | 0.11 | 0 |
| Advanced Fighter Statistics | ||
| win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. | 45.8% | 72.2% |
| recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. | 20.0% | 60.0% |
| win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. | -1 | -2 |
| total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. | 24 | 18 |
| head strike share | 51.9% | 83.8% |
| body strike share | 22.8% | 16.2% |
| leg strike share | 25.3% | 0.0% |
| sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. | 17.59 | 11.4 |
| takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. | 0.22 | 3.8 |
| cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | 0.9 | — |
| cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | 0.86 | — |
| cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | 1.25 | — |
| is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. | Yes | Yes |
| is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. | No | No |
| switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. | No | No |
| finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 27.3% | 69.2% |
| KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 0.0% | 30.8% |
| sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 27.3% | 38.5% |
| been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. | 23.1% | 40.0% |
| distance strike share | 84.9% | 89.2% |
| clinch strike share | 6.1% | 10.8% |
| ground strike share | 9.0% | 0.0% |
| avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. | 12:38 | 11:01 |
| Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. | 1,474.8 | 1,468.7 |
| PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. | 0.144 | 0.089 |
| career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. | Decline | Decline |
Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.
Create your free account