FightChoice Intelligence Report

vs

Casey O'Neill vs Eduarda Moura

https://fightchoice.app/events/casey-oneill-vs-eduarda-moura-prediction-2026-09-19

Women's Flyweight

UFC 331: Van vs. Pantoja 2 · Sep 19, 2026

In This Report

Prediction IntelClick here to expand

Stats Model Prediction

🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Sep 10, 2026, 19:03 UTC

Model Breakdown
Casey O'Neill Eduarda Moura
Deep Learning Model α 26% weight 49.0% 51.0%
Deep Learning Model ξ 25% weight 54.0% 46.0%
Statistical Model δ 13% weight 44.9% 55.1%
Statistical Model β 21% weight 57.8% 42.2%
Statistical Model ε 15% weight 64.7% 35.3%
Ensemble 56.2% 43.8%
AI Reasoning (why the models picked this)

Casey O'Neill's advantage in significant strikes landed and her higher Elo rating are key drivers for the prediction. Despite some models noting Eduarda Moura's strengths in control time and takedowns, the ENSEMBLE favors Casey O'Neill (56%) due to calibrated weighting of these factors.

  • Statistical Model β: Model β favors Casey O'Neill, citing her age advantage and higher win rate, despite Eduarda Moura absorbing fewer significant strikes.
  • Statistical Model ε: Model ε favors Casey O'Neill, pointing to her advantage in significant strikes landed and head strike share, despite Eduarda Moura's clinch strike share.

AI-generated from the model outputs above — wording may occasionally be imprecise.

Predicted Winner
Casey O'Neill
56.2%
Confidence
* Model output, not betting advice. Bet responsibly.
Predicted Duration
Decision (15m00s total)

Chance the Fight Is Still Going

62% Chance of Decision

The curve stays above 50% all the way to the final bell, which is why the call above is a decision.

Path To Victory
Fighter By decision *Based on 284 similar fights By KO/TKO *Based on 284 similar fights By submission *Based on 284 similar fights Win Confidence *Based on our prediction
Casey O'Neill 29.7% 17.8% 8.7% 56.2%
Eduarda Moura 23.1% 13.9% 6.8% 43.8%
284 historical bouts 52.8% 31.7% 15.5% 100.0%
Share This Intel Report
Fighter IntelClick here to expand

Tale of the Tape

Stat Casey O'Neill Eduarda Moura
Career Record 12-2 12-3
Height 5' 6" 5' 6"
Weight 125 lbs. 125 lbs.
Reach 69" 67"
Stance Orthodox Orthodox
Age 29 32

Records are official career records, all promotions included.

Export as Image

Matchup IntelClick here to expand

How Similar Fights Ended

284 historical bouts

Every past fight is placed by the SHAPE of its mismatch — how far apart the two fighters were on each of 37 career measures, setting aside which one was ahead. Fights that sit close together form a profile. Below is how the 284 bouts in this bout's profile actually ended.

53% Reached the judges
47% Ended early
32% KO/TKO 15% Submission 6:20 Median finish, round 2
When those finishes came

This is a base rate over similar past matchups, not a prediction about these two fighters. It is drawn from what happened historically, and the profile is blind to which corner is which — so it can say how fights like this one tend to go, and nothing at all about who wins.

Fights with a similar mismatch

Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.

Fight Casey O'Neill Eduarda Moura
80% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 14, 2009
UFC 105: Couture vs Vera
Middleweight
Michael Bisping Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 4m24s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
14.5
Strike accuracy
34.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.5
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.5
Control time (Per Rnd)
42.5s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
5.5
Strike accuracy
20.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
112.5s
77% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
May 16, 2020
UFC Fight Night: Overeem vs. Harris
Women's Strawweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
30
Strike accuracy
51.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
12.3s
Claudia Gadelha Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
28
Strike accuracy
40%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
55.7s
74% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Feb 10, 2018
UFC 221: Romero vs. Rockhold
Featherweight
Finish 2nd Rnd, 4m57s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
36.5
Strike accuracy
60.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
66.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
237.5s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
4
Strike accuracy
32%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
13.5s
74% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 26, 2023
UFC Fight Night: Holloway vs. The Korean Zombie
Featherweight
Max Holloway Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 0m23s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
25
Strike accuracy
58.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
19s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11.3
Strike accuracy
27.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
5s
73% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
May 7, 2022
UFC 274: Oliveira vs. Gaethje
Women's Flyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
10
Strike accuracy
41.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
65.7s
Tracy Cortez Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12
Strike accuracy
54.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
66.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
158s
73% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 8, 2019
UFC 238: Cejudo vs. Moraes
Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
35
Strike accuracy
39.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
1.7s
Aljamain Sterling Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
58
Strike accuracy
49.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
73% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 22, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Whittaker vs. Aliskerov
Middleweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
42.3
Strike accuracy
47.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Kelvin Gastelum Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
37.3
Strike accuracy
47.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
55.7s
73% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jul 7, 2007
UFC 73: Stacked
Lightweight
Jorge Gurgel Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
22.3
Strike accuracy
29.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
104s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
16.3
Strike accuracy
29.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
1s
73% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Apr 4, 2015
UFC Fight Night: Mendes vs Lamas
Lightweight
Al Iaquinta Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
18.3
Strike accuracy
35.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
2.3s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
27.7
Strike accuracy
48.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
8.3s
72% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Oct 24, 2009
UFC 104: Machida vs Shogun
Middleweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
8.3
Strike accuracy
16.2%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
6.3s
Chael Sonnen Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
30.3
Strike accuracy
32.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
57.1%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
103s
72% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Sep 5, 2015
UFC 191: Johnson vs Dodson 2
Flyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11.6
Strike accuracy
47.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.2
Takedown accuracy
33.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
35s
Demetrious Johnson Winner
Decision 5th Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
17.6
Strike accuracy
51.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.8
Takedown accuracy
30.8%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
59.8s
72% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Oct 7, 2017
UFC 216: Ferguson vs. Lee
Lightweight
Tony Ferguson Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 4m02s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
18
Strike accuracy
52.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.7
Control time (Per Rnd)
0.7s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
18.3
Strike accuracy
46.2%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
96.3s
72% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 17, 2019
UFC 241: Cormier vs. Miocic 2
Lightweight
Drakkar Klose Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
33
Strike accuracy
61.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
28.6%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
74s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
29
Strike accuracy
56.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
40%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
66.3s
72% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 23, 2019
UFC Fight Night: Thompson vs. Pettis
Women's Strawweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
2
Strike accuracy
28.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
42s
Randa Markos Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 4m24s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13
Strike accuracy
50%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
173s
72% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jan 3, 2015
UFC 182: Jones vs Cormier
Lightweight
Donald Cerrone Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12.3
Strike accuracy
44.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.7
Control time (Per Rnd)
73.7s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
5
Strike accuracy
28.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
14.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
40.3s

Export as Image

Statistics IntelClick here to expand

Head-to-Head Statistics

The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.

Stat Casey O'Neill Eduarda Moura UFC AVG
Per Round Average
Strikes 33.9 12 13.2
Strike accuracy 52.1% 37.8% 43.9%
Takedowns 0.4 1.1 0.4
Takedown accuracy 34.8% 33.3% 33.0%
Sub attempts 0.3 0.1 0.2
Control time 64.5s 124.4s 48.9s
Knockdowns 0.05 0 0.08
Knockdowns absorbed 0 0.07 0.13
Advanced Fighter Statistics
win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. 81.0% 76.5% 45.8%
recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. 60.0% 40.0% 37.6%
win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. 3 -2 -2
total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. 21 17 —
head strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the head. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 76.5% 86.7% —
body strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the body. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 13.9% 6.1% —
leg strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the legs. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 9.6% 7.2% —
sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 23.9 11.93 15.2
takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 0.3 0.13 0.4
cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.61 0.62 0.52
cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.45 1.32 0.56
cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.2 0.12 0.42
is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. Yes Yes —
is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. No No —
switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. No No —
finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 70.6% 69.2% 46.5%
KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. 41.2% 30.8% 27.9%
sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 29.4% 38.5% 18.7%
been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. 75.0% 50.0% 52.3%
distance strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown at distance. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 81.3% 62.2% —
clinch strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown in the clinch. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 4.6% 5.0% —
ground strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown on the ground. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 14.2% 32.8% —
avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. 9:55 11:46 —
Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. 1,568.5 1,502.1 1500
PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. 0.195 0.082 0.069
career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. Peak Decline —
Market IntelClick here to expand

Betting Edge

Fighter Win confidence DraftKings odds Break-even Edge
Casey O'Neill 56.2% 1.44 69.4% -19.1%
Eduarda Moura 43.8% 2.85 35.1% +24.8%

Odds are the latest we have from DraftKings. Edge = win confidence × decimal odds − 1, so a positive edge means the price pays more than our model thinks the fighter is worth.

Break-even = 1 ÷ decimal odds — the win rate you would need at that price just to come out level. It is the raw price, with the bookmaker's margin still in it, so the two fighters' break-evens add up to more than 100%: that surplus is the book's cut, not a mistake.

Recommended stake No bet recommended at the price we recorded.

Market Odds

Sportsbook Casey O'Neill Eduarda Moura
US Decimal US Decimal
Proline -263 1.38 +160 2.60
DraftKings -227 1.44 +185 2.85
FanDuel -233 1.43 +190 2.90
BetMGM -233 1.43 +190 2.90
Bovada -233 1.43 +190 2.90
BetOnline -213 1.47 +181 2.81

Odds captured Sep 19, 2026, 6:02 PM

Export as Image

More from UFC 331: Van vs. Pantoja 2

Joshua Van vs Alexandre Pantoja Arman Tsarukyan vs Mauricio Ruffy Patricio Pitbull vs Dooho Choi Gable Steveson vs Sean Sharaf Alonzo Menifield vs Iwo Baraniewski Marlon Vera vs Charles Jourdain Tai Tuivasa vs Robelis Despaigne Michael Aswell vs JooSang Yoo Ryan Gandra vs Ozzy Diaz Edmen Shahbazyan vs Brunno Ferreira Giga Chikadze vs Joanderson Brito

Put your own money-free bets on Casey O'Neill vs Eduarda Moura

Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.

Create your free account