FightChoice Intelligence Report
https://fightchoice.app/events/julien-leblanc-vs-gilbert-urbina-prediction-2026-10-17
UFC Fight Night: Buckley vs. Malott · Oct 17, 2026
🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Sep 26, 2026, 00:05 UTC
Gilbert Urbina is favored by the ensemble prediction, driven by significant reach advantages over Julien LeBlanc across multiple models. Model ζ's strong lean towards Gilbert Urbina is particularly influential, emphasizing reach and head strike share. Despite some models noting Julien LeBlanc's height advantage, the overall calibration and weighting favor Gilbert Urbina.
AI-generated from the model outputs above — wording may occasionally be imprecise.
*New fighters, prediction made with limited information
The dashed line is 50%. The round where the curve crosses it is the round named above — the midpoint of the distribution, not necessarily its single most likely outcome.
| Fighter | By decision *Based on 90 similar fights | By KO/TKO *Based on 90 similar fights | By submission *Based on 90 similar fights | Win Confidence *Based on our prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julien LeBlanc | 18.1% | 14.4% | 8.1% | 40.6% |
| Gilbert Urbina | 26.4% | 21.1% | 11.9% | 59.4% |
| 90 historical bouts | 44.4% | 35.6% | 20.0% | 100.0% |
90 historical bouts
Every past fight is placed by the SHAPE of its mismatch — how far apart the two fighters were on each of 37 career measures, setting aside which one was ahead. Fights that sit close together form a profile. Below is how the 90 bouts in this bout's profile actually ended.
This is a base rate over similar past matchups, not a prediction about these two fighters. It is drawn from what happened historically, and the profile is blind to which corner is which — so it can say how fights like this one tend to go, and nothing at all about who wins.
Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.
| Fight | Julien LeBlanc | Gilbert Urbina |
|---|---|---|
|
70%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Song vs. Gutierrez
|
Fight Performance
|
Steve Garcia
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
69%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Dos Anjos vs. Alvarez
|
Fight Performance
|
Gilbert Burns
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
69%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Smith vs. Clark
|
Bill Algeo
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
69%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Lauzon vs Stephens
|
Fight Performance
|
Gleison Tibau
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
68%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Manuwa vs. Anderson
|
Jimi Manuwa
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
67%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Holloway vs. Allen
|
Fight Performance
|
Azamat Murzakanov
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
66%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Adesanya vs. Pyfer
|
Fight Performance
|
Tofiq Musayev
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
65%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 194: Aldo vs McGregor
|
Fight Performance
|
Court McGee
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
65%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: MacDonald vs Thompson
|
Fight Performance
|
Jason Saggo
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
64%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 90: Silva vs Cote
|
Fight Performance
|
Gray Maynard
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
63%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 234: Adesanya vs. Silva
|
Fight Performance
|
Kyung Ho Kang
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
63%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 208: Holm vs. De Randamie
|
Ryan LaFlare
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
63%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC on FUEL TV: Mousasi vs Latifi
|
Fight Performance
|
Reza Madadi
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
62%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
The Ultimate Fighter: A Champion Will Be Crowned Finale
|
Fight Performance
|
Yancy Medeiros
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
62%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Sandhagen vs. Nurmagomedov
|
Azamat Murzakanov
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
| Stat | Julien LeBlanc | Gilbert Urbina |
|---|---|---|
| Career Record | 10-3 | 8-4 |
| Height | — | 6' 3" |
| Weight | 185 lbs. | 170 lbs. |
| Reach | — | 75" |
| Stance | — | Orthodox |
| Age | 34 | 30 |
Records are official career records, all promotions included.
The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.
| Stat | Julien LeBlanc | Gilbert Urbina |
|---|---|---|
| Per Round Average | ||
| Strikes | — | 21 |
| Strike accuracy | — | 57.9% |
| Takedowns | — | 0.6 |
| Takedown accuracy | — | 44.4% |
| Sub attempts | — | 0.1 |
| Control time | — | 53.6s |
| Knockdowns | — | 0.43 |
| Knockdowns absorbed | — | 0.43 |
| Advanced Fighter Statistics | ||
| win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. | 50.0% | 62.5% |
| recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. | 60.0% | 40.0% |
| win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. | -1 | 1 |
| total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. | 6 | 8 |
| head strike share | 25.0% | 66.7% |
| body strike share | 50.0% | 20.4% |
| leg strike share | 25.0% | 12.9% |
| sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. | 7 | 14.86 |
| takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. | 1 | 0.14 |
| cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | — | 0 |
| cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | — | 0 |
| cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | — | 0 |
| is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. | No | Yes |
| is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. | No | No |
| switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. | No | No |
| finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 100.0% | 80.0% |
| KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 66.7% | 40.0% |
| sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 33.3% | 40.0% |
| been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| distance strike share | 100.0% | 48.3% |
| clinch strike share | 0.0% | 15.0% |
| ground strike share | 0.0% | 36.7% |
| avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. | 2:22 | 4:24 |
| Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. | 1,481.9 | 1,488.0 |
| PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. | 0.024 | 0.068 |
| career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. | Peak | Decline |
Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.
Create your free account