FightChoice Intelligence Report

vs

Matheus Camilo vs Jai Herbert

https://fightchoice.app/events/matheus-camilo-vs-jai-herbert-prediction-2026-10-10

Lightweight

UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan · Oct 10, 2026

In This Report

Prediction IntelClick here to expand

Stats Model Prediction

🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Oct 2, 2026, 18:08 UTC

Model Breakdown
Matheus Camilo Jai Herbert
Deep Learning Model α 20% weight 51.5% 48.5%
Deep Learning Model ξ 22% weight 37.5% 62.5%
Statistical Model δ 20% weight 73.3% 26.7%
Statistical Model β 20% weight 82.5% 17.5%
Statistical Model ε 18% weight 68.1% 31.9%
Ensemble 68.3% 31.7%
AI Reasoning (why the models picked this)

The ensemble favors Matheus Camilo, driven by his significant advantages in age and past prime status over Jai Herbert, along with a notable edge in takedowns landed. Despite Jai Herbert holding a reach advantage, Matheus Camilo's superior win rate and Elo rating solidify the prediction.

  • Statistical Model β: Model β favors Matheus Camilo, citing his win rate and advantage in age and past prime status against Jai Herbert.
  • Statistical Model ε: Model ε favors Matheus Camilo, pointing to his edge in age, ground strike share, and takedowns landed versus Jai Herbert.

AI-generated from the model outputs above — wording may occasionally be imprecise.

Predicted Winner
Matheus Camilo
68.3%
Confidence
* Model output, not betting advice. Bet responsibly.

*New fighters, prediction made with limited information

Predicted Duration
2nd Round at 3m45s (8m45s total)

Chance the Fight Is Still Going

40% Chance of Decision

The dashed line is 50%. The round where the curve crosses it is the round named above — the midpoint of the distribution, not necessarily its single most likely outcome.

Path To Victory
Fighter By decision *Based on 140 similar fights By KO/TKO *Based on 140 similar fights By submission *Based on 140 similar fights Win Confidence *Based on our prediction
Matheus Camilo 33.7% 19.0% 15.6% 68.3%
Jai Herbert 15.6% 8.8% 7.2% 31.7%
140 historical bouts 49.3% 27.9% 22.9% 100.0%
Share This Intel Report
Fighter IntelClick here to expand

Tale of the Tape

Stat Matheus Camilo Jai Herbert
Career Record 11-3 14-6
Height 5' 10" 6' 1"
Weight 155 lbs. 155 lbs.
Reach 69" 77"
Stance Orthodox Orthodox
Age 25 38

Records are official career records, all promotions included.

Export as Image

Matchup IntelClick here to expand

How Similar Fights Ended

140 historical bouts

Every past fight is placed by the SHAPE of its mismatch — how far apart the two fighters were on each of 37 career measures, setting aside which one was ahead. Fights that sit close together form a profile. Below is how the 140 bouts in this bout's profile actually ended.

49% Reached the judges
51% Ended early
28% KO/TKO 23% Submission 4:18 Median finish, round 1
When those finishes came

This is a base rate over similar past matchups, not a prediction about these two fighters. It is drawn from what happened historically, and the profile is blind to which corner is which — so it can say how fights like this one tend to go, and nothing at all about who wins.

Fights with a similar mismatch

Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.

Fight Matheus Camilo Jai Herbert
69% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Oct 22, 2022
UFC 280: Oliveira vs. Makhachev
Women's Bantamweight
Karol Rosa Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
18
Strike accuracy
73%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
194.7s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12
Strike accuracy
60%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
56s
68% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 24, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Cannonier vs. Borralho
Women's Strawweight
Tabatha Ricci Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
33.7
Strike accuracy
42.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
75%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
101.3s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
37.3
Strike accuracy
51.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
3.3s
68% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 9, 2019
UFC Fight Night: Lewis vs. Dos Santos
Welterweight
Niko Price Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 4m50s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
32
Strike accuracy
47.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
2s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
31
Strike accuracy
64.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
110s
67% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Apr 23, 2016
UFC 197: Jones vs Saint Preux
Flyweight
Sergio Pettis Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
20.3
Strike accuracy
54.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
20%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
98s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11.7
Strike accuracy
31.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
14.3%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
38.7s
67% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 9, 2019
UFC Fight Night: Lewis vs. Dos Santos
Middleweight
Omari Akhmedov Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
17.3
Strike accuracy
38.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
64.7s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13.7
Strike accuracy
42.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0.7s
66% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 9, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Magny vs. Prates
Welterweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
3
Strike accuracy
37.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Finish 1st Rnd, 1m15s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11
Strike accuracy
31.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
20s
66% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Feb 20, 2021
UFC Fight Night: Blaydes vs. Lewis
Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11
Strike accuracy
33.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Aiemann Zahabi Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 3m05s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
9
Strike accuracy
81.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
10s
66% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 7, 2025
UFC 316: Dvalishvili vs. O'Malley 2
Lightweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
19.3
Strike accuracy
50.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
18.2%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
93s
MarQuel Mederos Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
36.7
Strike accuracy
66.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
12.7s
65% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 9, 2018
UFC 225: Whittaker vs. Romero 2
Heavyweight
Curtis Blaydes Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 2m56s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12.3
Strike accuracy
69.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
155.7s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
2.3
Strike accuracy
58.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.7
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
65% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 8, 2025
UFC Fight Night: Bonfim vs. Brown
Welterweight
Gabriel Bonfim Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 1m40s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
17.5
Strike accuracy
54.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
16.5
Strike accuracy
37.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
65% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Sep 26, 2026
UFC Fight Night: Rosas Jr. vs. Barcelos
Women's Strawweight
Yazmin Jauregui Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 1m02s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
34
Strike accuracy
60.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
2s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
7
Strike accuracy
36.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
64% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Oct 18, 2025
UFC Fight Night: De Ridder vs. Allen
Flyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
10.3
Strike accuracy
28.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
14s
Bruno Silva Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 2m15s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
15.3
Strike accuracy
62.2%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.7
Takedown accuracy
55.6%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
96.3s
64% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 3, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Sandhagen vs. Nurmagomedov
Lightweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11.3
Strike accuracy
40%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
90.7s
Guram Kutateladze Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
10
Strike accuracy
44.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
81.7s
63% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Oct 12, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Royval vs. Taira
Flyweight
Ramazan Temirov Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 2m50s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
23
Strike accuracy
41.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
5s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
4
Strike accuracy
25%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
—
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
63% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Sep 7, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Burns vs. Brady
Welterweight
Sean Brady Winner
Decision 5th Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
26
Strike accuracy
59.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.4
Takedown accuracy
41.2%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
126.8s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
9.4
Strike accuracy
48.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.2
Takedown accuracy
16.7%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
32.6s

Export as Image

Statistics IntelClick here to expand

Head-to-Head Statistics

The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.

Stat Matheus Camilo Jai Herbert
Per Round Average
Strikes 9.3 14.2
Strike accuracy 43.1% 41.6%
Takedowns 1.2 0.1
Takedown accuracy 53.8% 21.4%
Sub attempts 0.2 0
Control time 59.2s 44.3s
Knockdowns 0.17 0.25
Knockdowns absorbed 0 0.13
Advanced Fighter Statistics
win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. 83.3% 79.2%
recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. 80.0% 60.0%
win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. 2 1
total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. 6 24
head strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the head. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 64.3% 56.0%
body strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the body. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 17.9% 27.9%
leg strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the legs. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 17.9% 16.1%
sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 12.83 14.81
takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 0 0.43
cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.61 0.83
cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 2.31 0.57
cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.33 5.000
is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. Yes Yes
is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. No No
switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. No No
finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 60.0% 84.2%
KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. 40.0% 57.9%
sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 20.0% 26.3%
been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. 100.0% 60.0%
distance strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown at distance. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 91.1% 81.9%
clinch strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown in the clinch. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 1.8% 12.1%
ground strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown on the ground. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 7.1% 6.0%
avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. 8:25 10:14
Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. 1,517.0 1,497.8
PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. 0.080 0.134
career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. Peak Decline
Market IntelClick here to expand

Betting Edge

Fighter Win confidence DraftKings odds Break-even Edge
Matheus Camilo 68.3% 1.54 64.9% +5.2%
Jai Herbert 31.7% 2.54 39.4% -19.5%

Odds are the latest we have from DraftKings. Edge = win confidence × decimal odds − 1, so a positive edge means the price pays more than our model thinks the fighter is worth.

Break-even = 1 ÷ decimal odds — the win rate you would need at that price just to come out level. It is the raw price, with the bookmaker's margin still in it, so the two fighters' break-evens add up to more than 100%: that surplus is the book's cut, not a mistake.

Recommended stake 12% of bankroll on Matheus Camilo at 1.54 (DraftKings) * Model output, not betting advice. Bet responsibly.

Market Odds

Sportsbook Matheus Camilo Jai Herbert
US Decimal US Decimal
DraftKings -185 1.54 +154 2.54
FanDuel -192 1.52 +148 2.48
BetOnline -179 1.56 +157 2.57

Odds captured Oct 2, 2026, 6:05 PM

Export as Image

More from UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Duncan

Brendan Allen vs Christian Leroy Duncan Loopy Godinez vs Ketlen Souza Andre Fili vs Kai Kamaka III Julius Walker vs Gerald Meerschaert Malcolm Wellmaker vs Otari Tanzilovi Francisco Prado vs Ismael Bonfim Niko Price vs Leon Shahbazyan Felipe Franco vs Brendson Ribeiro Allen Frye Jr. vs RJ Harris Alice Pereira vs Daria Zhelezniakova Ernesta Kareckaite vs Melissa Gatto

Put your own money-free bets on Matheus Camilo vs Jai Herbert

Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.

Create your free account