FightChoice Intelligence Report

vs

Vanessa Demopoulos vs Yazmin Jauregui

https://fightchoice.app/events/vanessa-demopoulos-vs-yazmin-jauregui-prediction-2026-09-26

Women's Strawweight

UFC Fight Night: Rosas Jr. vs. Barcelos · Sep 26, 2026

In This Report

Prediction Intel

Stats Model Prediction

🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Sep 10, 2026, 19:05 UTC

Model Breakdown
Vanessa Demopoulos Yazmin Jauregui
Deep Learning Model α 20% weight 48.0% 52.0%
Deep Learning Model ξ 22% weight 53.4% 46.6%
Statistical Model δ 20% weight 35.2% 64.8%
Statistical Model β 20% weight 24.3% 75.7%
Statistical Model ε 18% weight 27.2% 72.8%
Ensemble 31.9% 68.1%
AI Reasoning (why the models picked this)

Yazmin Jauregui is favored by the ensemble prediction, driven by consistent advantages across multiple models in age, past prime status, and reach. Model ζ's strong lean is particularly influential. While most models favor Jauregui, Model λ notes Vanessa Demopoulos's edge in days since last fight and total fights, though this was outweighed in the final prediction.

  • Statistical Model β: Model β favors Yazmin Jauregui, citing her advantages in age difference, being past prime, win rate, and reach.
  • Statistical Model ε: Model ε favors Yazmin Jauregui, based on her age advantage, lower significant strikes absorbed, reach, and higher significant strikes landed.

AI-generated from the model outputs above — wording may occasionally be imprecise.

Predicted Winner
Yazmin Jauregui
68.1%
Confidence
* Model output, not betting advice. Bet responsibly.
Predicted Duration
Decision (15m00s total)

Chance the Fight Is Still Going

57% Chance of Decision

The curve stays above 50% all the way to the final bell, which is why the call above is a decision.

Path To Victory
Fighter By decision *Based on 284 similar fights By KO/TKO *Based on 284 similar fights By submission *Based on 284 similar fights Win Confidence *Based on our prediction
Vanessa Demopoulos 15.1% 10.9% 6.0% 31.9%
Yazmin Jauregui 32.1% 23.2% 12.7% 68.1%
284 historical bouts 47.2% 34.2% 18.7% 100.0%
Share This Intel Report Export as Image
Matchup Intel

How Similar Fights Ended

284 historical bouts

Every past fight is placed by the SHAPE of its mismatch — how far apart the two fighters were on each of 37 career measures, setting aside which one was ahead. Fights that sit close together form a profile. Below is how the 284 bouts in this bout's profile actually ended.

47% Reached the judges
53% Ended early
34% KO/TKO 19% Submission 4:51 Median finish, round 1
When those finishes came

This is a base rate over similar past matchups, not a prediction about these two fighters. It is drawn from what happened historically, and the profile is blind to which corner is which — so it can say how fights like this one tend to go, and nothing at all about who wins.

Fights with a similar mismatch

Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.

Fight Vanessa Demopoulos Yazmin Jauregui
79% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 7, 2025
UFC 316: Dvalishvili vs. O'Malley 2
Lightweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
19.3
Strike accuracy
50.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
18.2%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
93s
MarQuel Mederos Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
36.7
Strike accuracy
66.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
12.7s
78% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 6, 2020
UFC 250: Nunes vs. Spencer
Bantamweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
8.5
Strike accuracy
32.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Cody Garbrandt Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 4m59s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
9.5
Strike accuracy
44.2%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
1.5s
76% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 17, 2023
UFC Fight Night: Vettori vs. Cannonier
Bantamweight
Kyung Ho Kang Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 2m25s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
22
Strike accuracy
59.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
40s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13
Strike accuracy
44.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
73% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Dec 21, 2019
UFC Fight Night: Edgar vs. The Korean Zombie
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
9
Strike accuracy
64.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
132s
Chan Sung Jung Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 3m18s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
46
Strike accuracy
76.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
73% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Apr 27, 2019
UFC Fight Night: Jacare vs. Hermansson
Lightweight
Jim Miller Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 2m12s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
6
Strike accuracy
54.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
2
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
52s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
10
Strike accuracy
40%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
72% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 15, 2026
UFC 330: Makhachev vs. Machado Garry
Lightweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
15
Strike accuracy
46.9%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Esteban Ribovics Winner
Finish 2nd Rnd, 1m32s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
31.5
Strike accuracy
50%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
9.5s
72% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
May 23, 2015
UFC 187: Johnson vs Cormier
Welterweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
5.3
Strike accuracy
61.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.7
Control time (Per Rnd)
13.7s
Colby Covington Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
8.7
Strike accuracy
51%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.7
Takedown accuracy
20%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
227.3s
71% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Feb 24, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Royval 2
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
0
Strike accuracy
0%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
13s
Muhammad Naimov Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 0m44s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
1
Strike accuracy
50%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
11s
71% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Apr 24, 2021
UFC 261: Usman vs. Masvidal 2
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
6.3
Strike accuracy
38%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
26.7s
Pat Sabatini Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
8.7
Strike accuracy
57.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
20%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.3
Control time (Per Rnd)
199.3s
70% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Jun 9, 2018
UFC 225: Whittaker vs. Romero 2
Heavyweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
2.3
Strike accuracy
58.3%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0.7
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Curtis Blaydes Winner
Finish 3rd Rnd, 2m56s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12.3
Strike accuracy
69.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
155.7s
69% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Apr 30, 2022
UFC Fight Night: Font vs. Vera
Middleweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
12.3
Strike accuracy
40.7%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0.3
Takedown accuracy
25%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
38s
Krzysztof Jotko Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
21.7
Strike accuracy
52.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
1.3
Takedown accuracy
100%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
108.3s
69% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Mar 29, 2025
UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Erceg
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
18
Strike accuracy
51.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
2
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
1
Control time (Per Rnd)
85s
Jamall Emmers Winner
Finish 1st Rnd, 4m06s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
33
Strike accuracy
61.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
49s
69% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Aug 4, 2012
UFC on FOX: Shogun vs Vera
Featherweight
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
13.7
Strike accuracy
43.6%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
0%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
21s
Manvel Gamburyan Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
17.3
Strike accuracy
44.8%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
2
Takedown accuracy
50%
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
93s
69% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 7, 2020
UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Teixeira
Heavyweight
Andrei Arlovski Winner
Decision 3rd Rnd, 5m00s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11.3
Strike accuracy
41.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
22.7
Strike accuracy
57.1%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s
69% How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record. Match
Nov 9, 2024
UFC Fight Night: Magny vs. Prates
Welterweight
Finish 1st Rnd, 1m15s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
11
Strike accuracy
31.4%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
20s
Fight Performance
Strikes (Per Rnd)
3
Strike accuracy
37.5%
Takedowns (Per Rnd)
0
Takedown accuracy
Sub attempts (Per Rnd)
0
Control time (Per Rnd)
0s

Export as Image

Tale of the Tape

Tale of the Tape

Stat Vanessa Demopoulos Yazmin Jauregui
Career Record 11-8 11-2
Height 5' 2" 5' 3"
Weight 125 lbs. 115 lbs.
Reach 59" 64"
Stance Orthodox Orthodox
Age 38 27

Records are official career records, all promotions included.

Statistics Intel

Head-to-Head Statistics

The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.

Stat Vanessa Demopoulos Yazmin Jauregui
Per Round Average
Strikes 17.4 28.2
Strike accuracy 39.9% 39.4%
Takedowns 0.1 0
Takedown accuracy 10.3% 0%
Sub attempts 0.1 0
Control time 36.8s 18.3s
Knockdowns 0.04 0.20
Knockdowns absorbed 0.04 0.30
Advanced Fighter Statistics
win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. 68.2% 84.6%
recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. 40.0% 60.0%
win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. -3 -1
total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. 22 13
head strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the head. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 64.1% 62.4%
body strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the body. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 25.5% 16.7%
leg strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes that went to the legs. Head, body and leg sum to 100%. 10.4% 20.9%
sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 27.38 22.3
takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. 0.5 0
cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.91 0.49
cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 1.33 0.43
cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. 0.5 0.000
is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. Yes Yes
is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. No No
switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. No No
finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 40.0% 63.6%
KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. 6.7% 63.6%
sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. 33.3% 0.0%
been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. 14.3% 100.0%
distance strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown at distance. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 74.7% 82.3%
clinch strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown in the clinch. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 14.0% 9.6%
ground strike share Share of this fighter's landed significant strikes thrown on the ground. Distance, clinch and ground sum to 100%. 11.3% 8.2%
avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. 12:35 8:30
Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. 1,493.8 1,510.3
PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. 0.134 0.111
career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. Decline Decline
Market Intel

Betting Edge

Fighter Win confidence DraftKings odds Break-even Edge
Vanessa Demopoulos 31.9% 7.50 13.3% +139.5%
Yazmin Jauregui 68.1% 1.10 90.9% -25.1%

Odds are the latest we have from DraftKings. Edge = win confidence × decimal odds − 1, so a positive edge means the price pays more than our model thinks the fighter is worth.

Break-even = 1 ÷ decimal odds — the win rate you would need at that price just to come out level. It is the raw price, with the bookmaker's margin still in it, so the two fighters' break-evens add up to more than 100%: that surplus is the book's cut, not a mistake.

Recommended stake No bet recommended at the price we recorded.

Market Odds

Sportsbook Vanessa Demopoulos Yazmin Jauregui
US Decimal US Decimal
Proline +525 6.25 -1667 1.06
DraftKings +650 7.50 -1000 1.10
BetMGM +575 6.75 -909 1.11
Bovada +625 7.25 -909 1.11
BetOnline +663 7.63 -1000 1.10

Odds captured Sep 24, 2026, 12:02 AM

Export as Image

More from UFC Fight Night: Rosas Jr. vs. Barcelos

Raul Rosas Jr. vs Raoni Barcelos Rodolfo Vieira vs Robert Bryczek Mehemmedeli Osmanli vs Ilimbek Akylbek Uulu Melissa Amaya vs Tina Black Brady Hiestand vs Rinya Nakamura Rodolfo Bellato vs Christian Edwards Elves Brener vs Josiah Harrell Montel Jackson vs Ricky Simon Norma Dumont vs Ailin Perez John Castaneda vs Alatengheili Mickey Gall vs Sedriques Dumas

Put your own money-free bets on Vanessa Demopoulos vs Yazmin Jauregui

Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.

Create your free account