FightChoice Intelligence Report
🔒 Prediction locked in before the fight · Predicted Aug 16, 2026, 21:53 UTC
*New fighters, prediction made with limited information
The dashed line is 50%. The round where the curve crosses it is the round named above — the midpoint of the distribution, not necessarily its single most likely outcome.
| Fighter | By decision *Based on 131 similar fights | By KO/TKO *Based on 131 similar fights | By submission *Based on 131 similar fights | Win Confidence *Based on our prediction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamall Emmers | 21.2% | 16.3% | 8.8% | 46.4% |
| Lerryan Douglas | 24.6% | 18.8% | 10.2% | 53.6% |
| 131 historical bouts | 45.8% | 35.1% | 19.1% | 100.0% |
131 historical bouts
Every past fight is placed by the SHAPE of its mismatch — how far apart the two fighters were on each of 37 career measures, setting aside which one was ahead. Fights that sit close together form a profile. Below is how the 131 bouts in this bout's profile actually ended.
This is a base rate over similar past matchups, not a prediction about these two fighters. It is drawn from what happened historically, and the profile is blind to which corner is which — so it can say how fights like this one tend to go, and nothing at all about who wins.
Every fighter is reduced to a profile of 37 career measures as they stood going into the fight, standardised so that no single measure dominates merely for having bigger units — a far wider read than the six charted below. The bout is then described by the gap between the two: how far apart they were on each of those measures, setting aside which one was ahead. The fights listed here are those whose gaps line up most closely with this one. Because the match is on the shape of a mismatch rather than on a weight class or an era, a neighbour can come from an entirely different division.
| Fight | Jamall Emmers | Lerryan Douglas |
|---|---|---|
|
73%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Swanson vs Stephens
|
Fight Performance
|
Clint Hester
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
70%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 208: Holm vs. De Randamie
|
Fight Performance
|
Anderson Silva
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
70%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 110: Nogueira vs Velasquez
|
Chris Lytle
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
69%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Whittaker vs. De Ridder
|
Fight Performance
|
Martin Buday
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
68%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 308: Topuria vs. Holloway
|
Abus Magomedov
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
66%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Santos vs. Walker
|
Alejandro Perez
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
66%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Allen vs. Curtis 2
|
Norma Dumont
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
65%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Moreno vs. Royval 2
|
Fight Performance
|
Ronaldo Rodriguez
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
64%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 207: Nunes vs. Rousey
|
Fight Performance
|
Alex Garcia
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
64%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Hunt vs Nelson
|
Kiichi Kunimoto
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
64%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
The Ultimate Fighter: A Champion Will Be Crowned Finale
|
Charles Oliveira
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
63%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 278: Usman vs. Edwards
|
Jared Gordon
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
63%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC Fight Night: Barboza vs. Chikadze
|
Fight Performance
|
JJ Aldrich
Winner
Fight Performance
|
|
63%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 251: Usman vs. Masvidal
|
Marcin Tybura
Winner
Fight Performance
|
Fight Performance
|
|
63%
How closely the gap between these two fighters resembles the gap in that historical bout — the size and shape of the mismatch, not the fighters themselves. Two completely different pairs can produce the same mismatch. 100% would be an identical gap; two fights picked at random score about 36%, so a number near that means there is no real comparable on record.
Match
UFC 218: Holloway vs. Aldo 2
|
Fight Performance
|
Paul Felder
Winner
Fight Performance
|
| Stat | Jamall Emmers | Lerryan Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Career Record | 22-8 | 14-5 |
| Height | 5' 10" | 5' 9" |
| Weight | 145 lbs. | 145 lbs. |
| Reach | 74" | 72" |
| Stance | Orthodox | Orthodox |
| Age | 37 | 31 |
Records are official career records, all promotions included.
The same per-round and advanced numbers each fighter's profile shows, side by side. The stronger value in each row is highlighted.
| Stat | Jamall Emmers | Lerryan Douglas |
|---|---|---|
| Per Round Average | ||
| Strikes | 22.2 | 29 |
| Strike accuracy | 47.5% | 60.4% |
| Takedowns | 0.8 | 0 |
| Takedown accuracy | 53.3% | 0% |
| Sub attempts | 0.1 | 0 |
| Control time | 85.8s | 5s |
| Knockdowns | 0.16 | 2 |
| Knockdowns absorbed | 0.05 | 0 |
| Advanced Fighter Statistics | ||
| win rate Wins divided by this fighter's total recorded fights. | 79.3% | 66.7% |
| recent win rate Win rate over the last 5 recorded fights only — a form signal, not a career figure. | 60.0% | 80.0% |
| win streak Current run: a positive number is consecutive wins, a negative number consecutive losses. | 2 | 4 |
| total fights Total recorded fights, including bouts outside the UFC. | 29 | 6 |
| head strike share | 56.6% | 62.1% |
| body strike share | 30.6% | 10.3% |
| leg strike share | 12.8% | 27.6% |
| sig strikes absorbed Significant strikes opponents land on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. | 16.26 | 17 |
| takedowns absorbed Takedowns opponents complete on this fighter PER ROUND, counted from the round-by-round UFC stats across their scored rounds. Lower is better. | 0.16 | 0 |
| cardio sig ratio This fighter's significant strikes landed in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral: above it their output grows late, below it they fade. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | 0.31 | — |
| cardio defence ratio What OPPONENTS land on this fighter in the LATER rounds divided by what they land in the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. LOWER is better — a high value means opponents find them more as the fight wears on. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | 0.21 | — |
| cardio takedown ratio This fighter's takedowns in the LATER rounds divided by the EARLIER rounds. 1.0 is neutral. Shown only for fighters with at least 3 UFC bouts on record. | 2.33 | — |
| is orthodox Whether the fighter's recorded stance is orthodox. | Yes | Yes |
| is southpaw Whether the fighter's recorded stance is southpaw. | No | No |
| switch stance Whether the fighter is recorded as switching stance. | No | No |
| finish rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by finish, KO/TKO or submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 60.9% | 100.0% |
| KO win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by KO or TKO. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 39.1% | 100.0% |
| sub win rate Share of this fighter's WINS that came by submission. The denominator is wins, not fights. | 21.7% | 0.0% |
| been stopped rate Share of this fighter's LOSSES that ended by finish — the denominator is LOSSES, not fights. A fighter who is 20-1 whose single loss was a KO therefore reads 100%. | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| distance strike share | 80.3% | 86.2% |
| clinch strike share | 10.9% | 6.9% |
| ground strike share | 8.8% | 6.9% |
| avg fight duration (m:ss) Mean length of this fighter's UFC fights, in minutes and seconds. "—" means we hold no round-time data for them. | 9:37 | 3:33 |
| Elo rating A UFC-only Elo rating: it rises and falls with results, weighted by the opponent's rating. 1500 is the starting and dataset-average value. | 1,521.0 | 1,517.5 |
| PageRank How central this fighter is in the network of who-fought-whom. It reflects the quality of opposition they have shared a cage with, not their skill. | 0.234 | 0.073 |
| career stage Form over the last 4 fights before this one: 3 or more wins reads Peak, 2 or fewer reads Decline, and fewer than 4 prior fights reads Early. | Peak | Peak |
| Fighter | Win confidence | DraftKings odds | Break-even | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamall Emmers | 46.4% | 4.10 | 24.4% | +90.1% |
| Lerryan Douglas | 53.6% | 1.25 | 80.0% | -33.0% |
Odds are the latest we have from DraftKings. Edge = win confidence × decimal odds − 1, so a positive edge means the price pays more than our model thinks the fighter is worth.
Break-even = 1 ÷ decimal odds — the win rate you would need at that price just to come out level. It is the raw price, with the bookmaker's margin still in it, so the two fighters' break-evens add up to more than 100%: that surplus is the book's cut, not a mistake.
| Sportsbook | Jamall Emmers | Lerryan Douglas | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | Decimal | US | Decimal | |
| Proline | +260 | 3.60 | -500 | 1.20 |
| DraftKings | +310 | 4.10 | -400 | 1.25 |
| FanDuel | +340 | 4.40 | -435 | 1.23 |
| BetMGM | +310 | 4.10 | -400 | 1.25 |
| Bovada | +310 | 4.10 | -385 | 1.26 |
| BetOnline | +300 | 4.00 | -400 | 1.25 |
Odds captured Aug 22, 2026, 12:03 AM
Decimal odds over time, by sportsbook
Jamall Emmers
Lerryan Douglas
Create a free account to run any matchup through our AI ensemble of statistical models, track a fantasy bankroll, and bet the card. No card required.
Create your free account